Ansys vs abaqus reddit My question is this: why is ANSYS able to model the system and COMSOL not able to? Or, if you like, what makes ANSYS's solvers (direct solvers in this case) better or more robust than COMSOL's? Jul 26, 2024 · The UEL method can be used to build user-defined elements. If you have suggestions or opinions that push you towards one vs the other let me know! Also, ANSYS saves files in the ". Not as powerful but more modern and similar to abaqus. My understanding is that Ansys workbench is good for beginners (from meshing perspective) and advanced users would prefer another meagre for meshing. From your question it seems like you're new to FEA, and this isn't a particularly easy simulation to get right. It is probably the best explicit solver out there, and can be used for a huge range of problems. ) are used most in each… Oct 19, 2018 · ANSYS APDL interface is outdated by 20 years (ABAQUS CAE is way better and more intuitive). FYI it will be replaced/overshadowed with Abaqus in the future as that's DSS' plan. So it'll be Solidworks+Abaqus and ANSYS Workbench + Spaceclaim to compete with NX. NASTRAN SOL 106 is fine for many problems if you don't have large strains. I am a relative newcomer to the field of FEA. These two finite element software simulate mechanical analysis for engineering and design purposes such as stress evaluation, optimizing a design, buckling process, static and dynamic analysis, structures behavior under different loading conditions, etc. May 3, 2023 · The cost of Abaqus licenses can be higher than ANSYS for similar capabilities. Also I see that most professional Ansys users use packages like Hypermesh or Ansa for meshing and then import the mesh to Ansys and run it. NASTRAN is a solver and it is used as processor so you cannot compare Ansys and Nastran. ANSYS: ANSYS APDL: APDL – ANSYS Parametric Design Language. The new interface from ABAQUS called ABAQUS CAE is so much easier to use compared to ANSYS. 2 days ago · Explore a comprehensive Abaqus vs ANSYS comparison,💯💮 key differences between Abaqus and Ansys, along with access to a free Abaqus course and PDF tutorial. Better convergence and contacts. I wanted to know the advantages and disadvantages of using Abaqus vs Fusion 360. For fluid flow Ansys fluent will be nice. Dec 23, 2007 · Can anyone shed some light on how ABAQUS and ANSYS compare to one another? For those with experience with both, which one to do you prefer? I have experience with ANSYS and find many things about it not user-friendly. When it comes to Ansys/Abaqus, there's not just the one software package. The preprocessor ABAQUS CAE is user frinedly and lot more capable than Workbench. anyhow one can learn the workflow/UI of the other software later. All the big FEA companies will soon be producing all-in-one (CAE and FEA combined) fully integrated products. Nastran is great for load path distributions and numerous loadcases. log" file that contains all the commands to the tasks you just did in ANSYS. Is this true, and what other advantages/disadvantages does it have over For example: learning to script design optimization in Abaqus is more useful than writing your own fea code. The implicit solver also works pretty well and has seen a lot of improvement. ) I need to know which is better for doing what I want. However, the robustness of Abaqus's nonlinear solver and advanced features may justify the additional investment for some users. Sure, ANSYS Mechanical leaves a lot to be desired wrt meshing compared to Hyperworks but once you get the hang of it you can produce decent meshes. In my undergrad studies, for my machine design classes my supervisor is telling me to do Finite element analysis. I'm looking to model the interaction of a strong magnetic field and rebar surrounded by concrete. From my experience and what I've read, it seems that Abaqus is better suited to modeling nonlinear systems such as biological tissue. Many people who perform dynamic analyses prefer ANSYS. In general Ansys has pretty good nonlinear capabilities relative to Nastran, but Abaqus I’ve heard is best for nonlinear. It should guide you fairly easily. I’m just a starter. Ansys vs Abaqus Career/Education For over 10 years I used SolidWorks for design and analysis structural and sheet metal work, and I wanna to take a deep look at the most popular design software usage in Europa. You're probably not looking to create super 13 votes, 32 comments. I have come across a lot of people going through the requirements as mentioned by u/thegibbon88 where a simple problems can be solved by any tool with good results, but scaling up the use of CFD for big cases becomes a bottleneck, especially with on-premise tools. If you intend to do any non-linear analysis, ABAQUS is certainly better. That being said, linear FEM methods are incredibly easy to develop and the required FEM-rigor to produce accurate results is low. ABAQUS' fracture mechanics and contact problem solvers were better. The ANSYS folks have told us straight up that DL is "not an engineering tool, but a design tool". ABAQUS means finite element computer code. Misses stress and global displacement under load. This is definitely a tricky question. My options are limited to Ansys or Abaqus or some freeware (if it is suggested. Hi, I'm a user of CalculiX solver, and would like to compare they results against comercial codes as Abaqus or Ansys. Hi u/tobi_209, . I would say more of the auto industry uses abaqus and more of the aerospace industry/energy industry uses ansys. Dec 23, 2007 · ABAQUS is more expensive, but it is definitely very capable and more user friendly. Now such capabilities of ANSYS are also very satisfactory. Every FEA package has its own pros and cons. ANSYS is very powerful but also a bit archaic in use. db" file. The Dec 8, 2005 · The price of ANSYS is lower than the ABAQUS, the difference could be several thousands, because ANSYS is sold by the outside dealers. I would be incredibly surprised if it didn't match power-tools (Abaqus, NASTRAN, ADPL) in linear analyses. Element type, materials, model, etc. COMSOL is another one to look at that I'm particularly fond of. Many of my professors informed me for higher studies ‘Abaqus’ 2 days ago · 1- ABAQUS ANSYS introduction. You're not losing anything by just reading the theory guide and using the software. Users may automate and personalize their ANSYS models with I need to make a displacement vs frequency graph to identify frequency band gaps for a composite material. In my view, I don't see a lot of industries using comsol, it is more of an educational thing but it's either Ansys or Abaqus so you should focus on 1 software and learn it thoroughly. A colleague has implemented the same geometry and physical properties in ANSYS, with contact modeling, and the solution converges (quite quickly). i am building a recangular stack of unit cells. u/saywherefore is spot on. the bottom is fixed and the top is subjected to a distributed load. The problem is that our prof told us to perform it on software other than Ansys. Because Ansys is the most known one, they are growing very fast and they adjust their software for usability and functionality. If you can afford it, ABAQUS is the way to go. I recently got an FEA project, we have to do an analysis on any CEP problem of our choice. I have prepared some examples, this is the first one, a static analisys of an aluminium bracket, were we want to check V. The order is nice because then you don't miss anything. They made another software called workbench. I'm new to the field and trying to better understand which CAE products (Nastran, Abaqus, Ansys, etc. There is definitely a larger learning curve with ls-dyna compared to say Abaqus, but I prefer using ls-dyna over all the other solvers I have worked with so far. Both ANSYS and Abaqus have large user communities, which can be valuable resources for learning and troubleshooting. Hi, I work for a medical device company that is looking to bring either Abaqus or ANSYS into the business and I would like to have your perspectives on how to decide or generate a pros or cons list of each software. Please correct me if I’m wrong. Dec 8, 2005 · In terms of technical capabilities, ABAQUS is superior. The ANSYS Parametric Design Language is still useful though, but you can get the same results using But Altair is the leader in structure optimization (very efficient solver, big know how, very useful support) while Ansys is a very well build complete package. ABAQUS’s functionality can be expanded by using several other subroutines, such as USDFLD for user-defined field variables and UHYPER for hyperelastic materials. Ansys has a ton of different modules/packages, as does Abaqus. A little tip, follow the ANSYS menu on the left. I have used Ansys (workbench, mechanical) and there are some good things about it, but it’s not as common in aerospace structures work. Each CFD tool has its own advantages and disadvantages. OpenFOAM is also good. In my experience, ANSYS wants you to let it handle most of the meshing and makes it difficult to manually mesh the way you would in Hyperworks or ABAQUS. this load will be applied at different frequenices to determine the frequency band gaps but i do not know the best way to apply the load at a frequency. ANSYS stands for the analysis system. I can't really get into details, but depending on the level of mechanical licence (pro/enterprise/etc), number of HPC packs (yes, you can ONLY USE 4 Cores with basic ANSYS in 2024) you will find the price around €70-100k+ easily. Well I don't know any other, what do you guys say whether ABAQUS would be good option or should I look for some other software? Jan 25, 2012 · Most people I know prefer ABAQUS for nonlinear analysis. ANSYS' own GUI is better than that of ABAQUS, which came out much later. Community and Support. I used ANSYS workbench for 4-5 years. The solid meshing utilities are nice. You can still learn everything you need to about tet vs prismatic meshes, grid convergence, galerkin vs collocation methods, etc. I find the geometry tools in ANSYS cumbersome, so if you have to create geometry in it I would not recommend it. If you do it interactively, it writes a ". . Ansys being a very user friendly software it is widely used in Hello all. wkaqc mabrvy hegqm gvj kdyue wjgph tnphlmlp hvku qctfk yyzolhg