Philips fidelio x2hr vs shp9500 reddit. But for both gaming and music I'd take the X2HR every time.
Philips fidelio x2hr vs shp9500 reddit The length of the cable is what differs between them. Great for the use case you described. Their bass range also provides more punch. X2HR V shaped sound and full bass; Hifiman is more neutral, but great clarity. The 560S while great, is neutral/clinical/flat. I was used to closed back gaming headsets, which at first made my new X2HR sound like they lacked a bit of bass. My initial impression when I listened to the X2HR was that they felt claustrophobic and muddy. Personally I would get rid of the SHP9500 and keep the X2HR. The Philips Fidelio X2HR has a cable of 10. But I don't dislike any of them. They both use a 1/8″ TRS for connection. The X2HR is the most comfortable of the three. I recommend the X2HR . Heard some people have had quality control issues with the x2hr. But for both gaming and music I'd take the X2HR every time. They are great cans for the value and would be a good pairing with the 560s if you want something with more oomph to put on to watch a movie or play a game. In many respects, I prefer the sound of the 9500 over the X2HR. Both are respectable soundstage although X2HR is a bit better. Currently using a Corsair Void headset for gaming and I have felt like I was getting lack luster results. Others say that the bass doesn't let them. Ofcourse good for music too. In the end I ended up picking up the X2HR for around €100 and added the V-moda BoomPro microphone. A place for discussion, news, reviews and DIY projects related to portable… Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Fidelio X2HR v. HD599 is unnaturally warm in the midrange and the low-end is bloated in the mid-bass and rolled off in the sub-bass. I've never owned open back headphones before. Nov 26, 2021 · Not sure which one out of the two I should choose. Neither of them needs an amp. The Fidelio X2 is a more enjoyable headphone in every way compared to the SHP9500. Feb 9, 2021 · Today we’re going to talk about Philips SHP9500 vs X2HR with reviews and overall features. Philips SHP-9600 . Rtings comparison. The main difference is the treble tuning where the X2HR has a dip centred around 5-6kHz to reduce the perceived "graininess". SHP9500 and X2HR both are open-back headphones. The SHP9500 does enough well and it's lighter and subjectively more comfortable. The bass reach is essential. That was correct until I used the equalizer settings from oracle1990. Both these headphones are minimal, chic, and convey a neutral sound to you. Primarily I used the 9500s for gaming because the consensus was they were better for that purpose. Some people say the X2HR are amazing and that it helps them locate enemies. But with the X2HR coming down from 150 to 126 dollars, it might be a good time to get the X2HR instead. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. The SHP9500 was actually the first decent headphone I ever had, and I had gotten the X2HR a couple of months later in an attempt to upgrade. 1. X2HR was like, yeah, pretty good, albeit grew on me. Now I can track footsteps a lot better with the X2HR and actually prefer them over the shp9500 for gaming. They don’t necessarily scale with more power to have greater dynamics. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. And I saw them for as low as $75 on sale some time ago. Coming from a SHP9500 with oratory's Harmon EQ. l Liked the comfort and soundstage but wasn't a fan of the treble and lack of bass. Hifiman has clearer imaging. Just things to think about. Im new in the headphone game and i got the SHP9500 for 6-7 months ago, i was very impressed and then i got the Fidelio x2hr 2 months ago and i dont hear any diffrence. 84 ft. If you are looking for straight SHP9500 upgrade, you should put interest in ATH R70x, they are pretty similar to Philips, but everything is simply better. Philips Fidelio X2HR vs X2 New this community, don’t have a lot of experience with high end headphones. I just can't find a clear conclusion on wether the HD560s are better or if the X2HR are better. Mostly looking for comfort while gaming and sounding good enough for playing rythm games. They sound bassier than the others you’ve mentioned. The X2HR have a fantastic sound stage and are especially good for films and cinematic games. I like the 9500, but I love the X2HR. Plenty of bass, easy to drive to an okay volume but you need an amp to get more volume. The Fidelio X2HR have a sleeker and more premium design, and they look and feel a bit more durable. Oct 17, 2022 · I have the SHP9500 and I just sold the X2HR--it came down to comfort. I think the pads on the X3 are supposed to kinda suck as well, but don't quote me on that. 1M subscribers in the headphones community. The SHiPs are a very good headphone at their price, and they're both well built and very comfortable. So IDK. Or check it out in the app stores Philips SHP9500 vs SHP9600 vs Fidelio X2HR: Best all-rounder . They also are single ended (TRS 3. I ordered the X2HR and as long as they sound better than those I'll be happy. X2HR is quite large, heavy, clampy, pads are itchy, and the cable is microphonic (easy to find cheap replacement though). PA: Philips Fidelio X2HR vs BeyerDynamic 990 Pro So I'm looking to buy my first open back headphones. May 15, 2024 · The Philips Fidelio X2HR and the Philips SHP9500 are wired headphones, indicating that they use cables to connect to any device. I own the 840, 9500 and tried and retured the x2hr the 9500 is comfortable but has little to no bass and peaky treble, the x2hr was just downright crap muddy bloted bass and sharp treble not balanced at all, the 840 along with AKG K612, HD600 and DT880 are far more balanced headphones that i also have and use on rotation looking at frequency response would sure explain a lot to you try this I Wonder how noticeable these problems are, since I'm not knowledgeable or experienced with good headphones (I've been using an Arctis 3 2019 Edition Wireless for all purposes for ~3 years) However, besides the soundstage, the Philips seem to outperform the HiFiMan. The X2HR is bassier and warmer, more lively and more engaging. I personally prefer X2HR over HD599. I don't really care about MSRP as X2HR usually available for $100-120 street price brand new. If both are the same price, it's a no brainer, go for the Fidelio. Both headphones are great with a very good sound profile. I currently own the BD 770 and I love practically everything about them apart from the ridiculously long non-detachable cable, so my first thought was to go for the 990s, but I've read that the highs can be a bit too much on them. Both are open-back headphones with a similar design and performance, but the X2HR have a more neutral, balanced sound profile. 5mm) and can’t be run balanced if that’s something you wanted to try without drilling holes in them. To me they are worth the 30 bucks over the 9500. The X2HR was my first 'proper' headphone, I liked it initially, don't think I'd recommend it now though. So I have many Philips Headphones, including both SHP9500/9600, as well as the Fidelio L2, and X1S/2HR/3. In terms of soundstage, to me, the 9500 is considerably wider. At first I had to get used to the "open back" sound. Since your coming from a Audio Technica Ath m50x, I would recommend skipping the Philips shp9500, and going for the X2HR. Comfort-wise, HD599 is better. I bought two SHP9500 and found them excellent for the price. The Audio Technica Athm50x is quite bass heavy, and the shp9500 is going to be very bass light compared to the m50x, and I imagine it’s going to be a very drastic change, and the lack of bass might be hard to stomach, so As a glasses wearer, you won't get on with the X2HR, it's got a fairly significant clamp, and rather stiff pads. I have others, but I will limit myself to these for now. AFAIK the X2HR has less bass energy but the same extension, presumably to reduce distortion at high bass volumes and to fit the revised treble tuning. I always liked the X1S and X3 better than the X2HR ironically, and also the 9600 over the 9500. In the Rtings test, it seems like the SHP9500 has a more balanced treble, it's one of the best. The Philips SHP9500 and the Philips Fidelio X2HR are both great open-back headphones for neutral sound listening. I have a feeling this is a product refresh kind of situation . Fidelio X2 has a much bigger sound stage, and better imaging (although not great compared to other headphones, but those are much more expensive). What are you looking for sound wise? I’d say go with the X2HR. I was weighing my own options not long ago and after looking at the specs for the shp9600 and the Fidelio X3 they are identical to the X2HR and the shp9500. Mabye slightly in the low bass but it is so minnimal its comical. I own both. I have both the shp9500 and the X2HR. Headphones - Open Back Both of these are so close right now in What you don't need is the bass rumble. Philips Audio Philips SHP9500 vs Philips Audio Fidelio X2HR vs Philips Fidelio L2 vs OneOdio 594 votes, 119 comments. The first time I heard the sound out of the Hifiman it was "instant love". 30ft, whereas the cable length of the Philips SHP9500 is 9. At the very least use the X2HR a bit before you return it. Comparing brand new to used 560s is a bit weird, and used X2HR still will be half the price of 560s. But the X2HR has more activation and accurate pinna resonance, the cartilage of the ear, and bass. Looking for an upgrade Narrowed down my choices to the X2HR and the HE400SE, but welcome any other alternatives too I do not have an amp right now but could consider getting one for the HE400SE “The Philips Fidelio X2HR are better headphones for neutral sound than the Philips Fidelio X3. That’s okay. The ShiPs are the closer to neutral of the two. nyuv etisgu dfqqmv wkfr xbkf uvz obkkmsj slj ipijj xshpm